Generative semantics for prepositions , prefixes , and compounds
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents ideas for formally representing and working with prepositions as stand-alone constructs in connection with nouns and verbs, as prefixes, and as connecting constituents in compounds. As main starting points serve (a) Davis’ proto(typical) roles for linking subject and complements of verbs with semantic roles in HPSG, (b) Pustejovsky’s generative lexicon theory, and (c) Cyc’s approach to hierarchical semantic relations. The objective is to reduce specification effort to a minimum while maximizing the possibilities to combine words, stems, and prefixes generatively: The semantics of prepositions in space, time, and logic as well as the principles of language-specific conceptualizations are put to use in hierarchical specifications. As much information as possible is stored in more general specifications. The issue is one of precisely constraining lexical entries and generatively explaining creative language use. Applications: (1) Machine translation – for each language prepositions are mapped only to and from the interlingual representation. (2) Disambiguation – the semantic structures of the preposition’s arguments refine each other. (3) Selectional restrictions and the semantics of compounds – verbs, prepositions, and nouns carry syntactic as well as semantic information whose compatibility is checked by means of generative lexicon theory.
منابع مشابه
Goal-Source Asymmetry and Russian Spatial Prefixes
In this paper, I draw on data from Russian to argue for an asymmetry between Goal and Source prepositional phrases. Source prepositional phrases are structurally ambiguous; they can occur both as arguments and adjuncts in certain syntactic contexts. Goal prepositional phrases are unambiguously arguments. I claim that Source prepositions have lexically specified semantics, which determines their...
متن کاملRussian prefixes and prepositions in Stratal OT
A less discussed point — though equally evident — is that Russian prefixes and prepositions cannot be unified as a class on the basis of their morphosyntactic characteristics. The theoretical aim of the present work is to resolve the apparent contradiction between the phonological unity and the morphosyntactic disunity of these two categories, by proposing a Stratal Optimality Theoretic approac...
متن کاملSemEval-2010 Task 9: The Interpretation of Noun Compounds Using Paraphrasing Verbs and Prepositions
We present a brief overview of the main challenges in understanding the semantics of noun compounds and consider some known methods. We introduce a new task to be part of SemEval-2010: the interpretation of noun compounds using paraphrasing verbs and prepositions. The task is meant to provide a standard testbed for future research on noun compound semantics. It should also promote paraphrase-ba...
متن کاملPhonetic evidence for clitic-host relations within the prepositional group in Russian
The paper presents a corpus-based research on clitic-host relations within the prepositional group in Russian. As a phonetic criterion for determining the relation between clitics and their hosts, we suggest using the degree of vowel reduction— the phenomenon functioning within the prosodic word. A comparison of vowel reduction patterns for clitic group vs prosodic word with no adjacent clitics...
متن کاملRussian Yers and Prosodic Structure
In this paper I investigate a previously neglected aspect of the phonology of Russian vowel-∅ alternations involving verbal prefixes and prepositions. There is evidence both for and against the notion that prepositions and verbal prefixes — which I will call P, for short — have identical phonological behavior. There are at least two processes that suggest that P forms a unified phonological cat...
متن کامل